Schutt F7 2.0 vs. VICIS Zero2 Adult Football Helmet

Design and Construction

Both helmets approach protection from different philosophies. The Schutt F7 2.0 sticks with a traditional shell but upgrades its internal components significantly. It uses a proven polycarbonate shell and adds new technology like the RFLX-S layer and Tektonic plates for rotational force management. The VICIS Zero2, however, was engineered from the ground up with a deformable outer shell — a design not based on traditional football helmets but on automotive impact principles. The Zero2 aims to reduce energy transfer through compression of the outer shell and strategic internal layering. While the F7 2.0 refines an established structure, the Zero2 redefines what a helmet can be.

Impact Protection Technology

Both helmets feature multi-layered protection systems designed to disperse energy. The Schutt F7 2.0 integrates five levels of impact management, including the RFLX-S columns between the shell and liner, D3O foam, and outer Tektonic plates that allow for 3D movement, helping mitigate rotational forces. The VICIS Zero2 also uses a five-layer system but builds around its deformable shell and internal RFLX 2.0 columnar structure, which buckles to dissipate energy. Each helmet takes a layered approach, but while Schutt combines traditional materials and movement mechanics, VICIS applies engineered materials and dynamic deformation for more adaptive protection.

Fit and Comfort

Fit systems differ significantly. The F7 2.0 relies on a stacking pod system and includes inflatable components that can be fine-tuned with a pump. This offers a custom feel, though it introduces complexity and requires proper maintenance. The VICIS Zero2 replaces the need for inflation with its DLTA pod system — modular pads of varying thicknesses that snap into six locations inside the helmet. This allows for quick and tool-free customization. Schutt’s approach gives players nuanced control over fit but needs more effort, whereas VICIS focuses on simplicity and precision through its pod-based design.

Vision and Awareness

Both helmets prioritize visibility but use different methods. The F7 2.0 pairs with specialized F7 facemasks designed for wide sightlines and field awareness. VICIS, however, optimizes both horizontal and vertical sightlines through its facemask architecture, making it especially advantageous for positions that rely on full-field vision. Players will find that both offer clarity, but the Zero2 is purposefully engineered to maximize visual range.

Weight and Feel

While exact weight specifications for the F7 2.0 aren't publicly detailed, it retains a balanced feel and is designed for comfort through enhanced padding and stabilization. The VICIS Zero2 is 15% lighter than its predecessor, the Zero1, and is built with weight distribution in mind. Both helmets aim for a lightweight feel, but VICIS takes specific steps to reduce mass without sacrificing performance, potentially making it more comfortable over long durations.

Chinstrap and Facemask Options

Each helmet includes a quality chinstrap — the F7 2.0 comes with a hard cup version, while the Zero2 features a SportStar Extra Deep Hard Cup chinstrap, a favorite among elite players. The F7 uses a loop strap system for attaching facemasks (sold separately), while the Zero2 includes a stainless steel facemask of your choice with a hard mount attachment system. VICIS offers more out-of-the-box value with its included components, whereas Schutt gives more flexibility for equipment managers already stocked with compatible facemasks.

Safety Ratings and Maintenance

Both the F7 2.0 and Zero2 receive Virginia Tech’s coveted 5-star rating, indicating top-level protection. However, maintenance and risk of damage differ. Schutt’s inflation-based system can pose issues if not handled carefully — improper inflation can damage liners and void return eligibility. VICIS avoids this altogether by using a non-inflatable, modular fit system, reducing the risk of user error during setup and adjustment.